Forums

  1. General

    1. Community

      main forum; discussion of ocremix, games, music, anime, and related topics

      332,512
      posts
    2. Competitions

      participate in various competitions (remixing, writing, art, etc.), or start your own

      39,954
      posts
    3. History & Study of Video Game Music

      Ludomusicology, analysis, research, & discussion of VGM

      220
      posts
    4. OverClocked Podcast

      discuss the latest episodes of the overclocked podcast!

      202
      posts
    5. OverClocked Records

      discussion, reviews, q&a regarding overclockedrecords.com

      22
      posts
    6. ReMix Requests

      please mention the game & song in the title of the post - no guarantees or promises!

      11,264
      posts
    7. Site Issues & Feedback

      design, database, & associated technical discussion of ocremix.org

      9,003
      posts
  2. Workshop

    1. Music Composition & Production

      talk about making music - questions, answers, tips, gear recommendations, etc.

      49,541
      posts
    2. Post Your Game ReMixes!

      post work-in-progress & completed game remixes here for feedback

      58,674
      posts
    3. Post Your Original Music!

      post work-in-progress & completed originals or other non-vgm related music here for feedback

      14,336
      posts
    4. Post Your Art!

      post your original non-musical work, including visual art, writing, videos, etc.

      1,916
      posts
    5. Projects

      announcements/info/discussion of OCR-related projects

      49,066
      posts
    6. Recruit & Collaborate!

      recruit for a project you're starting, or find someone to collab with on a mix!

      10,738
      posts
  3. Comments/Reviews

    1. Album Comments/Reviews

      discussion and comment threads for released album projects

      6,383
      posts
    2. Judges Decisions

      public viewing of Judges' decisions on submitted ReMixes.

      30,426
      posts
    3. ReMix Comments/Reviews

      post reviews of specific ReMixes - please read review guidelines before posting

      72,144
      posts
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      44,773
    • Total Posts
      814,114
  • Topics

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • 80% of tracks are now claimed! @noTuX just hit me up with a great wip of Forest of Illusion, with a really cool vibe that reminded me of one of my first favorites from this site (hint: the remix number is double digits!). we're down to one slow track and three fast remaining! i should note that while my goal is to have two equal discs, i'm happy to have one be longer or shorter than the other depending on song length. i'm not going to shovel some trash on there to meet an arbitrary track requirement.
    • Great, thanks for the update! @M_Blacki, could you please reach out to Rhino about the mixing on this track?
    • EVAL Well, this was a pretty full of energy! You got some nice, meaty drums, the side chaining to really back them up, and the glitchy, something-step sound overall does the source wonders. I think the main thing that I will comment on is that your lead has a bit too much portamento to it. When it's really juiced up on the portamento the notes often just sound flat rather than sliding to them properly. As a rule of thumb, if the note spent more time sliding than it did on the note, it's not going to be recognized as that note, so tone it down when it's supposed to be landing on the notes (like at 1:36 - it sounds pretty rough there). I will also note that it would be nice to hear at least one other instrument used as a lead from time to time, as that lead starts to wear on you after nearly five minutes. Otherwise, I think you have something worth submitting, here. It'd be a borderline case even as is, but if you take Starphoenix and my word for the lead and switch it out once or twice for something else, and tweak the portamento where it makes the lead sound too swanky I think you'll have a pretty solid chance at getting posted.
    • Wow, this was one of the few that have been eval'd by Level 99 & Emunator, way back when. It would be nice if they dropped by periodically to say hello to the WIP boards again, from time to time, as they're pretty cool dudes. But I digress - time to give it an eval, Gario-style! EVAL Alright, you've spent quite a bit of time on this, and I do think you're close. The idea is interesting, and the source is recognizable. The production is in pretty good shape, to boot - I'm not hearing things like overcompression or limiting errors in this, which is good. You're probably tired of hearing the humanization issues on this, so I'll rephrase it in a way that might be more useful - your articulations are mechanical. Particularly, the attack envelope of your samples all swell when a real performer might only do such swelling at the beginning of a phrase. This afflicts most of your samples (solo violin, oboe, backing strings), so it's something that can't be ignored, if you presented this to the panel. Fortunately, most samplers that I've seen have knobs that allow you to adjust the attack of your sample, so decreasing the 'attack' of your samples will give you a tighter articulation. If that swell is inherent in the sample itself that's unlucky, but there's still hope in that samplers sometimes also offer an adjustment of where to start in the sample. Start after the inherent swell fo the sample and viola! Tighter articulation. I would highly suggest considering the phrasing of your instrumental lines, and focusing a little on when it makes sense for something to swell and when it makes no sense to do so, and adjust accordingly. I spent a lot of time on that (as it's the most noticeable concern), but I will also quickly point out that the mixing doesn't have enough focus to it. I hear a particular instrument (such as at 0:15 and 0:46) that pops out whenever it's around - that guitar. It really makes more sense as a supporting instrument, but it's mixed in a way that brings it to the front, at the cost of your more melodic instruments (like your violin and oboe). Past 1:45 it becomes difficult to follow your track, because of how things are mixed - there's little for the listener to grab onto, which results in the track sounding like it meanders. The strings sound like they should be the focus at that point, but they are mixed pretty far in the background (and have the aforementioned swelling that squashes their sound). Pay careful attention to your mixing. I do hope some of that helps you out. I hate to say this would still not pass the panel in its current condition, but I would be doing you no favors if I weren't honest. Pay attention to your articulations, and mix it in such a way that the listener can follow the most important elements and it'll fare better. Best of luck!
  • Popular Contributors

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      34,162
    • Most Online
      7,385

    Newest Member
    oldfan
    Joined
  • Recently Browsing