Of course a judge will have a vested interest in not getting a song he believes shouldn't pass not passed. We do it all the time, if not publically. We don't judge in little boxes and then read what everyone else said after the fact. We're a panel of judges. We discuss, argue, disagree, and try to convince.
He was, and there is nothing wrong with that. No, idealistically and realistically we judge a track on its own merits and faults and also take into account what our fellow judges say about it. Sorry, but no. If you construe that from what he said, you're an idiot. Plain and simple. Oh sorry, was that unprofessional?
Grow some thicker skin and don't cry on other peoples' behalf. Lurk more.