DarkeSword

When posting a new topic, ou can choose one of the four preset prefixes. The default prefix is 1. work-in-progress. As you get feedback and develop your track, change the prefix accordingly to indicate the status of your track. This helps the evaluation team keep tabs on your track. Here are the prefixes and what they mean:
work-in-progress
Your track is a work-in-progress and you need feedback from the community. This is the default prefix. ready for review
Change your prefix to this when you want a workshop evaluator to give your track an official look. Once they provide you with feedback, they'll change your track back to 1. work-in-progress. completed
Change your prefix to this when you feel you're done with your track. submitted
Change your prefix to this once you have submitted your completed track to the Judges Panel. As you can see we've numbered the prefixes to help you iterate through the process, but if you want to jump ahead and just post a completed track that doesn't require review, you can do that with the appropriate prefix as well.

Really nice take on the source tunes. Never heard this OST before, it's pretty good.
Live performances are great and as a result, I feel like the sequenced strings are being exposed, especially the lower marcato stuff. I think you'd have done better to lean on your wind players in that regard.
Either way, it's still way above the bar. I like it! YES

When posting a new topic, ou can choose one of the four preset prefixes. The default prefix is 1. work-in-progress. As you get feedback and develop your track, change the prefix accordingly to indicate the status of your track. This helps the evaluation team keep tabs on your track. Here are the prefixes and what they mean:
work-in-progress
Your track is a work-in-progress and you need feedback from the community. This is the default prefix. ready for review
Change your prefix to this when you want a workshop evaluator to give your track an official look. Once they provide you with feedback, they'll change your track back to 1. work-in-progress. completed
Change your prefix to this when you feel you're done with your track. submitted
Change your prefix to this once you have submitted your completed track to the Judges Panel. As you can see we've numbered the prefixes to help you iterate through the process, but if you want to jump ahead and just post a completed track that doesn't require review, you can do that with the appropriate prefix as well.

OCremix is not dying, your standards for activity are just out of whack.

So you just signed up for the forums and have a shiny, brand-new forum account. I'm sure you want to pretty it up and customize it as much as you can, which is great, but we've got a couple of things you need to keep in mind when you're doing that. Here goes!
The Real Name field is for your real name only.
This field isn't required, and if you don't want to put anything in there, that's fine. But the real name field is not for any titles or nicknames you came up with. If you put something in there that isn't your real name, then you'll be asked to change it, or we'll change it for you.
You're only allowed to have one account.
Don't make alternate-accounts for secondary identities or anything like that. You're allowed to have one account on the forums. The OC ReMix forums are not role-playing forums; you're not a bunch of characters in a story, you're a real person participating in a community. Please don't make a new account if you want to "test out something" pertaining to how the forum works (i.e. testing permissions, notifications, etc.). That's not your job, that's the job of the moderation team. Full disclosure: I have an alt-account specifically for testing forum permission related issues.

Hey man, what are you doing? What's going on? Everyone in this topic is discussing DAWs that use sheet music and you're posting strange off-topic complaints. Do you have something to contribute in this topic with regards to DAWs that use staff notation as a way of writing the MIDI data or what?

I had the pleasure of writing the music for Chucklefish's Wargroove, a spiritual successor to old-school tactical games like Advance Wars:
Being a huge fan of tactical games myself, this was a bit of a dream gig and I'm extremely proud of how the tunes turned out.  Wargroove is available on Steam, Humble, Switch, and Xbox One/Windows 10 (w/ Xbox Play Anywhere).
The soundtrack is available on my bandcamp and on Steam as DLC (can also be bundled with the game for 10% off!).  It'll also be available on all major streaming platforms by the 15th.

Hope you love both the game and the soundtrack!

Hey, don't do this. Don't call out other replies as "patronizing." Give your advice without the snide commentary.

Hey, don't do this. Don't call out other replies as "patronizing." Give your advice without the snide commentary.

Hey, don't do this. Don't call out other replies as "patronizing." Give your advice without the snide commentary.

Hey, don't do this. Don't call out other replies as "patronizing." Give your advice without the snide commentary.

Done

While OCR's Content Policy is quite permissive with regards to ReMix usage in streams and videos, we've seen reports of videos getting hit with Content ID matches on YouTube against tracks from our catalog. Some matches are bogus (stolen tracks, false positives, etc.), some are legitimate (tracks that are a part of a commercial release, audio matched to a source tune, or legitimately claimed by the ReMixer). Here's a list of ReMixes we know have had issues in the past. If you're a streamer or video creator, avoid these tracks.
It should be noted that this list is not comprehensive, only because -- as we post new ReMixes -- other tracks may get added. We also don't have any list available for Twitch, though we haven't heard of issues there. It's possible that there are other tracks that will get your video flagged, and we periodically update this list. Unfortunately there's not a lot we can do about it, except recommend that when you contest your ContentID match with YouTube, link OCR's Content Policy. We've heard reports of people using that to get the hit removed.
We also recommend using Rainwave's song widget for Twitch for their OCR radio station. When new songs trigger YouTube's ContentID, Rainwave staff will get in touch with us and vice-versa in order to keep this list updated.
OC ReMix #4318: Final Fantasy IV "Empress Waltz" [medley] by RebeccaETripp feat. Samantha Ballard, May Claire La Plante, Medllix, P2 Sue, Kristin Naigus, PitTan, Michelle Eng, Tiggs, Julia Henderson, MatcHey OC ReMix #4289: Zelda II "Secret Labyrinths" [Great Temple, Temple BGM, Lost Woods] by Gaspode OC ReMix #4134: Chrono Cross "All I Am" [~Scars Left By Time~] by Moiré Effect, Viking Guitar OC ReMix #4112: Tetris "T-Spin" [A-Type (Korobeiniki)] by Schtiffles OC ReMix #4065: Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim "Dragonborn Concerto" [Dragonborn] by Mazedude, Dhsu OC ReMix #3919: Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time "Princess Ruto" [Zora's Domain] by Smooth4Lyfe OC ReMix #3719: Mass Effect "One Small Step" [Uncharted Worlds] by Moiré Effect OC ReMix #3716: Super Castlevania IV "Dracula Is Our Vampire!" [Vampire Killer] by Jorito, BMC_WarMachine OC ReMix #3679: Mega Man 5 "A Crook Man's Eyes" [Dark Man Stage] by Nightswim OC ReMix #3669: Final Fantasy VI "Snowy Pines" [Terra] by RebeccaETripp OC ReMix #3662: Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild "The Triforce Needs Five More Minutes" [Temple of Time] by Joe November OC ReMix #3532: Kingdom Hearts "Protect Your Kingdom" [Dearly Beloved] by Smooth4Lyfe OC ReMix #3476: Pokémon Silver Version "Lucky Coin" [Goldenrod Game Corner] by Schtiffles OC ReMix #3408: Chrono Trigger "But You're Still Hungry" [A Desolate World] by Marshall Art OC ReMix #3284: DuckTales 'Apollo Duck' [The Moon] by WillRock OC ReMix #3216: Super Mario Galaxy 'To the Stars' [medley] by Stephan Wells, Laura Intravia OC ReMix #3193: Super Mario 64 'Sunken Ship' [Dire, Dire Docks] by Leandro Abreu OC ReMix #3154: Mega Man 3 'Harder Than Steel' [Hard Man Stage] by The Megas OC ReMix #3083: Final Fantasy VI 'Day of Ruin' [Kefka] by Dj ThirdEye OC ReMix #2998: Metroid Prime 'Hot Machine, Cold Surface' [Ice Valley] by Ben Prunty OC ReMix #2978: Xenogears '(You Give Me) Wings' [Wings] by Ivan Hakštok OC ReMix #2959: Harlequin 'Coming to Chimerica' [In-game 3]] by Binster OC ReMix #2883: Final Fantasy X 'Just This Once' [Suteki da ne] by Dj Mystix, Sabrina Valenzuela... OC ReMix #2680: Final Fantasy XI Online 'A Decent Challenge' [Battle Theme] by Tweex OC ReMix #2670: Legend of Zelda 'I Do It for the Faeries' [Above Ground] by The OneUps OC ReMix #2412: Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker 'Her Smile in Every Summer' [Outset Island] by Hot Freaks OC ReMix #2387: Ufouria 'Above the Clouds' by Drakken OC ReMix #2212: Final Fantasy VI 'Forever, Young Rachel' [Forever Rachel] by Poolside, David Saulesco OC ReMix #2118: Super Meat Boy 'Power of the Meat' [Betus Blues, Forest Funk] by Poolside OC ReMix #2023: Final Fantasy VIII 'Shine Tonight' [Fragments of Memories] by Poolside OC ReMix #1506: Double Dragon II 'Twin Blood' [Mission 9 (Final Screen)] by Sixto Sounds OC ReMix #1295: Final Fantasy VII 'Aeris Lives' [Aeris's Theme, The Prelude] by Kevin Lau OC ReMix #1175: Mega Man 2 'Chillout' [Dr. Wily Stage 1] by sedure OC ReMix #1162: Final Fantasy VII 'Prayer' [Aeris's Theme] by MENBAH! OC ReMix #1138: Donkey Kong Country 2 'Forest Birdcussion' [Forest Interlude] by Protricity OC ReMix #1114: Dance Dance Revolution 4th Mix '4F73R M3' [B4U] by MC & SGX OC ReMix #1034: Wizards & Warriors 'Wise Wizards, Old Warriors' [Title] by bazooie OC ReMix #888: Super Mario World 'Super Mario's Sleigh Ride' [Map 2, Overworld BGM] by The OneUps OC ReMix #598: Super Mario Bros. 'Underworld Rock' [Underground BGM] by dimmer OC ReMix #587: Soul Blazer 'Tears for a Moonlit Knight' [A Night Without a Lover] by Israfel OC ReMix #577: Super Mario Bros. 2 'Super Buck II' [Overworld BGM] by Estradasphere OC ReMix #455: Zanac 'Space Dance' [medley] by Insomnic OC ReMix #54: Metroid 'efsisos featuring Samus Aran' [Title] by efsisos

That's an interesting idea.
No.

hey fellas, sorry for the lateness; out of town right now w/ gf currently in hospital
music as soon as i can

When posting a new topic, ou can choose one of the four preset prefixes. The default prefix is 1. work-in-progress. As you get feedback and develop your track, change the prefix accordingly to indicate the status of your track. This helps the evaluation team keep tabs on your track. Here are the prefixes and what they mean:
work-in-progress
Your track is a work-in-progress and you need feedback from the community. This is the default prefix. ready for review
Change your prefix to this when you want a workshop evaluator to give your track an official look. Once they provide you with feedback, they'll change your track back to 1. work-in-progress. completed
Change your prefix to this when you feel you're done with your track. submitted
Change your prefix to this once you have submitted your completed track to the Judges Panel. As you can see we've numbered the prefixes to help you iterate through the process, but if you want to jump ahead and just post a completed track that doesn't require review, you can do that with the appropriate prefix as well.

Music will go up either tonight or tomorrow.

Music will go up either tonight or tomorrow.

Music will go up either tonight or tomorrow.

Music will go up either tonight or tomorrow.

My last thought, which I'm giving, leaving, and not coming back to:

One of my remixes is so far removed from the original that if you take away the original melody, because of the altered harmony and counterpoint, it sounds like a completely different piece.  I've actually performed said remix without the original melody as an original composition for a graduate composition recital.  An analysis of it shows that without the melody, the style, harmony, and counterpoint are so far removed from the original that it can classify as a completely different piece no matter how you look at it.  I mean like...it's now less than 10% the speed of the original, the melody was almost completely reharmonized.  The harmony doesn't even classify as tonal anymore at this point.  It has a loose key center, so it's key centric, but the function of the chords don't exist in a traditionally tonal sense.  If you speed it up 10x, then the groups of measures together suggest a tonal progression, but the actual phrases in the piece are not tonal.  Basically I wrote a contrafact of the Underwater theme from Super Mario Bros.

I'm a jazz musician, so the idea of taking several tunes with the exact same content and changing the melody is normal.  The concept of contrafact is kind of a center point of the genre.  Sometimes when people write a tune, the original writers fade into obscurity while the performers of said piece get credited.  Donna Lee is credited to Miles Davis, but that is heavily debated.  It is a contrafact of the tune Indiana, and is practiced as such.  The chord changes to I Got Rhythm are so iconic that we just basically call them rhythm changes.  There is no effort at all to hide the fact that it's basically the exact content of the song minus the melody.  There are other times where tunes are arranged in DRASTICALLY different styles and although they are the original song, they contributed to the development of the genre, or in some cases multiple genres in a significant way.  Many musicians do arrangements literally all the time to develop their compositional and arrangement technique.  More times than not, doing an arrangement of a VG tune in the style of a composer helps me learn more about the writing of that composer than if I were writing an original tune in that style.  It takes less time, so I can get more out of it really quickly.

Brahms wrote Theme and Variations on a Theme by Haydn.  But Brahms is credited as the composer, not the arranger.  In the classical canon, having a theme and variations form virtually always results in a new piece, even though the melodic content was written by somebody else.  Brahms, Mozart, Beethoven, and Strauss are some of the major composers in the classical canon, and they all wrote theme and variations on the themes of somebody else, yet are credited as the composers.  Theme and Variations on a Theme by Haydn was basically a remix of a piece by Haydn.  But Brahms is credited as composer.

I mean if by added some seasoning you mean I dumped so many seasonings to it that it's basically a mountain of rainbow powder with no liquid left, then yes.  I just added some seasoning of my own.  That is a simplification of what goes on and you know it, so please drop the condescending attitude toward the matter, thank you very much.

And please for the love of God don't do the thing where you quote each individual sentence of this post and make me defend it line by line, because I have better things to do with my time.  People get tired of that REALLY quickly, because more times than not, you simplify what they said in your response, which just adds fuel to the fire rather than continuing the discussion.  People waste so much more time correcting your simplifications than actually continuing the discussion because you "don't give a shit."

That's an interesting idea.
No.

dude, what's with the 'tude? lol
"*hits blunt*"..."pedantry"..."the logic being touted"... 
seriously bro? you keep making these ostensibly narrow-minded broad strokes about creativity and originality all the while lookin down your nose pretentiously at everyone offering a counter like you're the first person on these forums to write original music.
besides, there's plenty of logic in the premise being argued... that, barring legality and the most rigid of interpretations, there isn't a whole lot of difference between a piece of music that blatantly derives its tone, style, and phrasing from another and one that begins with the specific compositional structure but interprets it in an entirely unique and original approach. (i can tell you like examples as it ruffles your feathers somethin wicked so here's another:) a band that sounds exactly like System of a Down but writes songs System of a Down hasn't, isn't fooling anyone; they're not very original or unique. an artist who takes the epic orchestral Liberi Fatali and writes a killer four piece punk rock arrangement for their band is considerably more original no matter how hard you plunk on your keyboard trying to suggest otherwise. they're both derivative despite having different reasons for being so and yet can both be enjoyed for whatever element of them is original or refreshing without this unnervingly unnecessary debate. how is that not logical?
and no, dude, it isn't pedantic. for someone who supposedly takes great pride and care in "studying a score to discover what composition techniques," you sure have a fundamental misconception of how scrupulous and precise and overwrought with minutiae that writing music is. are you sure you actually do write any original music in the first place or are you just here to blow hot takes all over the thread? there's utterly nothing pedantic about a conversation on music, man. particularly on a music forum lollllllllll *insert Carl Sagan mind-blown gif here*
*hits blunt*
lol at this point, i'm not entirely shocked but even then, i'm still a bit perturbed that you'd dig up the ol' pot stigma card... blatantly undercutting Majeles' statement with the absurd suggestion that he must have been stoned to have said it, further denigrating any stance taken opposite yours. I can't quite figure out if you're 12 or 72. LIKE... BRUH HAVE YOU EVER HAD A FORUM DISAGREEMENT... ON WEEEEEED?????? 1998 called and wants its outdated weed dig back.
honestly, if you're so irritated with (by, at this point, SEVERAL...) people calling bullshit on your assertion that there is no creative or original value in the hard work of talented, creative, and original artists when working on video game arrangements... then why do you keep responding? especially if the only way you're going to do so is by being a colossal douche? like maybe some of us actually prefer to express their unique voice through videogame remixes. i personally don't; that's why i have an original music career. makes utterly no difference to me... but you know... it might to others and that's perfectly ok! i can recognize the artistry and abilities of any musician without having to pinky finger a point about how much better it is to write "original" music, suggesting those who disagree with you are "threatened" by the "inferiority" of the form... 
nahhhh, i'm pretty sure you're just being an asshole at this point.

When you're a Muslim kid who's used to hearing that stuff at the mosque, it's weird hearing it in a fantasy video game.

Music and voting up.